“Risky Business”: The Expanding Risk-Oversight Responsibility of Compensation Committees

5 Min Read By: John Cannon

In Brief

  • In the United States, the past 15 years have witnessed a parade of corporate crises and scandals in which the conventional wisdom holds that poorly designed compensation incentives played a major contributing role.
  • Accordingly, significant pressure has been placed on boards of directors and, in particular, compensation committees to ensure that incentive compensation features and overall plan design do not promote excessive short termism and risk-taking that could harm the long-term interests of the corporation and its shareholders.
  • The result: independent directors serving on compensation committees are burdened with more responsibilities than ever before, and many compensation committees are burdened with risk-mitigation-based oversight responsibility for the design of incentive compensation not just at the executive officer level, but further down in their organizations.

Overview of a Compensation Committee’s Basic Responsibilities

The listing requirements of both NASDAQ and the New York Stock Exchange mandate that a committee of independent, nonemployee directors must…

This is premium content for:

ABA Business Law Section Members.

Please log in or join the Business Law Section to read this full article.

For more information about joining the Section, click here.

By: John Cannon

Connect with a global network of over 30,000 business law professionals

18264

Login or Registration Required

You need to be logged in to complete that action.

Register/Login