Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Editors (5)

image description
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Sara Bussiere

Executive Editor, Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution
image description
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP

Armeen Mistry Shroff

Managing Editor, Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution
image description
Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP

Leslie Ann Berkoff

Contributing Editor, Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution
image description
Lewis Brisbois

Sean M. Brennecke

Contributing Editor, Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Filter By Topics: Topic

We're Sorry

No Results Found

We're Sorry

No Results Found

We're Sorry

No Results Found

MONTH-IN-BRIEF (Sep 2023)

Business Litigation

Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Contractual Freedom Concerning Remedies for Parties to LLC Agreements

By Sara Bussiere

In Holifield v. XRI Investment Holding LLC, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the Delaware Court of Chancery’s finding that a transfer of units was invalid under the applicable limited liability company agreement, which also, per the terms of the agreement, rendered the noncompliant transfers “void,” meaning that affirmative defenses did not apply. In so doing, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its prior ruling in CompoSecure, L.L.C. v. CardUX, LLC, 206 A.3d 807, 816 (Del. 2018), which permits parties to an LLC agreement to contract for incurable voidness. Though the Court of Chancery acknowledged that it was bound by CompoSecure, it urged the Supreme Court to adopt an alternative framework that would preclude parties from contracting for incurable voidness and reserve such a remedy for violations of state-imposed limits. The Supreme Court declined to accept that invitation, largely relying on the text and underlying policies of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, which establishes broad contractual freedoms for Delaware limited liability companies. The Court also found that the parties’ intent to contract for incurable voidness must be clear, though it declined to require that any “talismanic magic words” be included to establish such a remedy.

Dispute Resolution

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Non-Disclosure

Connect with a global network of over 30,000 business law professionals

18264

Login or Registration Required

You need to be logged in to complete that action.

Register/Login