MONTH-IN-BRIEF (Nov 2020)
“Controlled Group” Liability Under ERISA: The Gift That Keeps On Giving
By Michael Enright
“Controlled group” liability under ERISA is a thorny but common insolvency problem. It permits the PBGC to pursue corporations or LLCs that are separate and distinct from an entity that has liabilities connected to underfunded benefit plans, if the distinct corporations or LLCs are under common control (as defined in ERISA) with the insolvent entity. These liabilities can be staggering sums, so the issue can create a bet-the-company situation. The 11th Circuit recently contributed to the minefield of jurisprudence on controlled group liability by holding that affiliates of a corporation that was the sponsor of a benefit plan and that went bankrupt and dissolved in 1992 could be pursued for the underfunding claims years later despite the bankruptcy and dissolution. In PBGC v. 50509 Marine, LLC, Case No. 19-14968 (11th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020), the court was faced with claims brought by the PBGC in 2018 against 19 entities owned by Joseph Wortley. In 1992, an entity owned by Wortley that acted as the plan sponsor for a union pension plan, filed bankruptcy. Wortley himself filed bankruptcy a year later. The result of the bankruptcy cases was that Wortley surrendered all of his stock of the debtor, and the debtor was ultimately dissolved under state law. Nonetheless, for years afterward, Wortley continued to sign documents on behalf of the debtor entity as plan sponsor, despite the debtor’s dissolution. In 2012, the pension plan’s continuing shortfalls resulted in a resolution with the PBGC, which took the plan over and let Wortley off the hook going forward. In 2018, though, still looking to hold someone responsible for the shortfalls, the PBGC sued other entities owned by Wortley, alleging that they were liable as part of the same corporate “controlled group” as the bankrupt and dissolved plan sponsor. Although state corporate law was not favorable to the PBGC, because it appeared to provide that the corporate plan sponsor had long ago ceased to exist, the 11th Circuit turned to federal common law, which governs for purposes of determining controlled group liability under ERISA. Because Wortley continued to execute documents on behalf of the dissolved corporation as plan sponsor, and someone had to be the plan sponsor, the court held this was enough to implicate ERISA’s harsh corporate affiliate liability rules. Therefore, the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the PBGC was upheld. The case is another hard lesson regarding the risks associated with underfunded benefit plans. Any planning or strategy involving an entity that might have been in the same affiliated group as defined in ERISA must look long and hard at these issues if considering an insolvency proceeding or transaction.