Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence 2023

Editors

Bradford K. Newman

Partner, Litigation
Leader of AI and Blockchain Practice
Co-Chair of ABA AI and Blockchain Subcommittee
Baker McKenzie
600 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
(650) 856-5509
[email protected]

Adam Aft

Partner, IPTech
Chair North America Technology Transactions Practice
Baker McKenzie
300 E. Randolph St., Suite 5000
Chicago, IL 60001
(312) 861-2904
[email protected]

Contributors

Sam Kramer

Partner, IPTech
Baker McKenzie
300 E. Randolph St., Suite 5000
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 861-7960
[email protected]

Alex Crowley

Associate, IPTech
Baker McKenzie
300 E. Randolph St., Suite 5000
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 861-6598
[email protected]

Amarachi Abakporo

Associate, IPTech
Baker McKenzie
300 E. Randolph St., Suite 5000
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 861-8281
[email protected]

 

Mariana Oliver

Associate, IPTech
Baker McKenzie
300 E. Randolph St., Suite 5000
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 861-7977
[email protected]

 

Marcela Pertusi Hernández

Associate, IPTech
Baker McKenzie
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10018
(212) 626 4100
[email protected]

 

 

 



§ 1.1. Introduction


We are pleased to present the rapidly growing Chapter on Artificial Intelligence.  This year, we have added a new component by including significant blockchain cases.  Why?  Both AI and blockchain represent emerging technologies that present vexing legal issues for clients, business lawyers, litigators and the judiciary. This Chapter seeks to serve as a guide for those seeking a better understanding of this rapidly evolving legal landscape. 

It is no surprise that the number of cases and complexity of issues are proliferating.  With regard to AI, issues around bias and fairness continue to predominate as use cases and adoption across industries expand.  Questions around IP ownership and registrability, especially with generative AI tools, are also quickly becoming a hot topic. And Mr. Thaler continues to advance the question through  litigation of whether AI software systems can obtain a patent or copyright for its output. See e.g. Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022) (affirming the district court holding in

This is premium content for:

ABA Business Law Section Members.

Please log in or join the Business Law Section to read this full article.

For more information about joining the Section, click here.

MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR

Connect with a global network of over 30,000 business law professionals

18264

Login or Registration Required

You need to be logged in to complete that action.

Register/Login