On May 25, 2022, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission) proposed rules that would require registered and exempt investment advisers (Advisers) as well as registered investment companies (Registered Funds) to provide standardized environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures to their investors and the Commission (referred to herein as the ESG disclosures proposal). The SEC also proposed amendments to Rule 35d-1, which governs naming conventions for Registered Funds.[1]
These proposed rules aim to enhance ESG disclosure by requiring additional specific disclosure requirements regarding ESG strategies in fund prospectuses, annual reports, and adviser brochures. They also propose to implement a layered, tabular disclosure approach for ESG funds to enable investors to compare ESG funds at a glance, as well as to require certain environmentally focused funds to disclose the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their portfolio investments.[2] The objective of the proposed ESG strategy disclosure framework is to help investors determine whether a fund’s or adviser’s ESG marketing statements are translated into concrete and specific measures to address ESG goals and portfolio allocation. Additionally, the proposed disclosure rules will enable investors to make more informed decisions as they compare various ESG investments. The information required under the proposed rules on ESG investment strategies and disclosures should also be readily available to investment funds and advisers who consider ESG factors in their investment process, and thus is not expected to impose a heavy compliance burden. If adopted, the proposed ESG disclosure rules will mitigate the current risks related to voluntary disclosures—including greenwashing and lack of consistent, comparable, and reliable ESG data—which will boast investors’ confidence in ESG investing.
Over the years, there has been a tremendous growth in ESG investing. This is largely attributed to increasing public concern about and awareness of climate change, social inequities, and corporate accountability.[3] According to Morningstar’s 2022 “U.S. Sustainable Funds Landscape Report,” there were 534 sustainable funds available to US investors in 2021, an increase of 36% from 2020.[4] The money newly allocated to exchange-traded ESG investment funds also increased in 2021 according to Bloomberg, to $120 billion, which more than doubled the $51 billion invested in 2020.[5] With this increasing demand, asset managers have continued to create and market ESG products.
Despite explosive growth, ESG investing in its current form has faced some criticism, including from politicians and regulatory entities. Some politicians have called ESG investing a “scam,” and others have expressed dissatisfaction with the ESG rating and evaluation process.[6] Accurately marketing ESG funds is more feasible when companies in fund portfolios make relevant ESG disclosures, but when the US Government Accountability Office conducted a review of ESG disclosures and investment practices for public companies in 2020, it discovered that while public companies generally disclosed information about many ESG topics, those disclosures lacked details and consistency, potentially limiting their usefulness to investors.[7] Additionally, the inconsistency of the voluntary ESG disclosure and reporting framework has increased investor skepticism toward ESG investments. The 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer on U.S institutional investors highlighted that 86% of US investors question the accuracy of ESG disclosures, noting that companies frequently overstate or exaggerate their ESG progress.[8] 53% of investors doubt the accuracy of information on progress made on companies’ diversity and inclusion goals, and 52% doubt disclosures on effective management of climate risk.[9] All this is attributed to lack of a common disclosure framework tailored to ESG investing, which has made it difficult for investors to understand the investment policies associated with specific ESG strategies to inform their investment decisions.
With these adverse trends, the implementation of the proposed ESG strategy disclosure rules will be a step forward to create a consistent standard for ESG disclosures, which will boost investors’ confidence in ESG investment and enhance sustainable development of the US economy.
In recent years, both the federal government and the private sector have taken initiatives to address ESG risks relating to climate change, social injustice, and corporate accountability. The federal government has enacted federal tax credit programs[10] and issued executive orders on climate-related financial risks,[11] protection of public health,[12] and advancing equity and racial justice.[13] Legislation such as the Fossil Free Finance Act has also been proposed.[14] Private sector interest in ESG investing has also greatly increased. For instance, in 2021, more than $600 billion went into ESG-focused funds worldwide according to Refinitiv Lipper data,[15] and a record $105 billion in private investments were made into clean energy assets, adding an unprecedented amount of renewable power capacity.[16]
While progress has been made, there is still much to be done to realize the US goals of lowering greenhouse gas emissions by 50–52 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 and reaching a net-zero emissions economy by 2050 set by President Biden.[17] Significant work also needs to be done to enhance corporate accountability, advance equity, and promote racial justice in our communities.
To realize the above goal and improve ESG investment efficiency across all sectors, the Commission should implement the proposed ESG disclosure rules as a means of exercising its mandate of investor protection and the maintenance of an orderly capital market. Investment advisers and funds play a critical role in providing investment advice and managing investment assets, which makes them an appropriate vehicle to address the current ESG disclosure challenges.
Impact
The implementation of the proposed ESG strategy disclosure rules by investment firms and advisers will improve information and allocation efficiency, which are critical for capital market growth. It will also increase confidence in the capital markets, a pivotal factor in attracting capital. This confidence may also attract capital from investors who are currently reluctant to invest due to knowledge gaps or information asymmetries. With the implementation of the proposed ESG disclosures, the Commission will be better able to promote a resilient economy and support an orderly, economy-wide transition towards the goal of net-zero emissions, social justice, and corporate accountability.
The SEC also proposed new requirements for public companies regarding climate-related disclosures in March 2022.[18] That proposal is largely beyond the scope of this article, but ESG disclosure rules for public companies would also enable investment advisers to more accurately market ESG funds, which would likely enhance the competitiveness of US capital markets and public companies. Similarly, the proposed ESG disclosure rules for Advisers and Registered Funds and the proposed rules for public companies together could also facilitate investment in companies that support gender equality and thus promote gender equality in the workplace, resulting into a boost in the US economy. The US economy would increase by $4.3 trillion by 2025 if true equality between men and women was achieved through improvements in women’s full participation in the workforce, the share of women’s jobs that are full time, and the mix of sectors in which women work.[19]
Despite the numerous benefits, mandatory ESG disclosures have been criticized by some who believe they will impose a significant cost burden on businesses, particularly smaller businesses, due to additional reporting requirements. Critics further assert that the cost of compliance burden may drive more companies from America’s publicly traded stock markets, which has fewer corporate listings today than in the mid-1990s.[20] Other criticisms include the notion that mandatory ESG disclosures will diminish the importance of material industry- and company-specific disclosures and may increase the likelihood of costly plaintiff-driven securities fraud litigation.
In light of the aforementioned benefits, however, the impact of implementing the proposed mandatory disclosure rules regarding ESG will not only benefit investors seeking to invest in ESG-focused funds but also contribute to the sustainable development of the US economy. Furthermore, it will serve as a benchmark for future ESG-related legislation, as well as a guide for companies in developing their ESG strategies, a critical step in building a sustainable economy.
In conclusion, the sustainable development of the US economy requires the participation of all stakeholders. Focus should not be restricted to only positive outcomes, but address shortfalls as well to help build a more robust economy that is inclusive. The implementation of the proposed ESG disclosure rules will be a recognizable milestone that can attract more global investment funds to US corporations and drive the US economy to more sustainable development.
SEC, “SEC Proposes to Enhance Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies About ESG Investment Practices,” May 25, 2022. ↑
SEC, “Fact Sheet: ESG Disclosures for Investment Advisers and Investment Companies,” May 25, 2022. ↑
Morningstar, “U.S. Sustainable Funds Landscape Report,” January 31, 2022. ↑
Id. ↑
Helee Lev, Conservice ESG, “ESG funds set a new record inflow by doubling in 2021,” December 13, 2021; Tim Quinson, “The ESG Market Is Controlled by a Few Big Investors,” Bloomberg, December 1, 2021. ↑
Antea Group, “Navigating the Politics of ESG as a Business Leader,” November 2, 2022. ↑
US Government Accountability Office, “Public Companies: Disclosure of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors and Options to Enhance Them,” July 2020. ↑
Edelman, “2021 Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors,” November 17, 2021. ↑
Id. ↑
Monarch Private Capital, “ESG Investment Types: Federal Tax Credits.” ↑
The White House, “Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk,” May 20, 2021. ↑
The White House, “Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,” January 20, 2021. ↑
The White House, “Advancing Equity and Racial Justice Through the Federal Government.” ↑
Office of U.S. Senator Ed Markey, “Senators Markey and Merkley Announce Legislation to Get Big Banks to Stop Financing Fossil Fuel Projects,” November 4, 2021. ↑
Ross Kerber and Simon Jessop, “Analysis: How 2021 became the year of ESG investing,” Reuters, December 23, 2021; Jennifer Wu, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, “ESG outlook 2022: The future of ESG investing,” January 2, 2022. ↑
Brian Eckhouse, “U.S. Clean Energy Draws Record $105 Billion in Private Investment,” Bloomberg Law, March 3, 2022. ↑
The White House, “Fact Sheet: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies,” April 22, 2021; Financial Stability Oversight Council, “Report on Climate-Related Financial Risk,” 2021. ↑
SEC, “Proposed Rule: The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors,” March 21, 2022. ↑
Kweilin Ellingrud, James Manyika, and Vivian Riefberg, “How reducing gender inequality could boost U.S. GDP by $2.1 trillion,” Harvard Business Review, April 12, 2016. ↑
Vartika Gupta, Tim Koller, and Peter Stumpner, McKinsey & Company, “Reports of corporates’ demise have been greatly exaggerated,” October 21, 2021. ↑
